Tracking business formation, AI adoption, broadband, and digital skills across every state and territory. Data from ASIC, ATO, NBN Co, ACCC, ABS, LinkedIn, and NAIC.
"What this quarter's data makes clear is that digital fitness in Australia is not a capacity problem for most jurisdictions — it is a consistency problem. The ACT demonstrates what high performance looks like across every weighted metric simultaneously, and the distance between that benchmark and the rest of the country tells us where investment and policy attention need to be directed."
— Miralda Ishkhanian, Chief Operating Officer at Honcho
95.8 vs 84.7
ACT Leads By An Unbridgeable Margin
The ACT posted a composite score of 95.8, outpacing second-placed NSW by 11.1 points — the largest gap between any two adjacent rankings this quarter. Its ABN registration rate of 160.42 per cent of the national benchmark and an AI adoption rate of 88 per cent anchor that lead across the two heaviest weighted components. No other jurisdiction comes close on either measure.
NT 45.9
Northern Territory Signals A Structural Divide
The Northern Territory recorded a composite score of 45.9, less than half the ACT's result and nearly 26 points below seventh-placed Tasmania. Its AI adoption rate of 45 per cent and digital skills score of 40 are the lowest across all eight jurisdictions, while the absence of a broadband speed data point reflects infrastructure gaps that compound the shortfall. The NT's result is not a marginal underperformance — it represents a category of its own.
SA 99.57
South Australia Punches Above Its Weight
South Australia's ABN registration rate of 99.57 is the highest among the five mainland states, and its broadband speed of 101.4 Mbps leads all jurisdictions where data was recorded. Despite those standout metrics, the state's composite of 78.9 reflects drag from a company registration rate of just 26.47 — the lowest on the mainland — which limits its overall ranking to fifth.
Editor's note
ACT's composite score of 95.8 leaves every other jurisdiction at least 11 points behind in Q1 2026.
Q1 2026 — State rankings
What this score measures
Every existing state and territory business ranking in Australia measures registration volume in raw numbers. The biggest states win by construction, because they have the most people. That is not insight. It is geography.
This score asks two different questions. First: which states and territories are building genuine digital fitness and AI capability in their business base, not just registering businesses? Second: when you compare states and territories on an equal footing of per 10,000 residents, where is entrepreneurial and digital dynamism actually concentrated?
The answers are materially different from what any existing ranking produces.
What "digital fitness" means here
Digital fitness is not a binary. It is a composite of eight measurable conditions: whether new businesses are forming at a healthy rate per resident; whether the infrastructure exists to support AI and cloud tools; whether the workforce has the skills to use them; and whether state and territory policy is creating the enabling conditions for all of the above.
This score measures observable data from primary government and commercial sources including ASIC, ATO, NBN Co, ACCC, ABS, NAIC and LinkedIn, updated quarterly. Every component, weight, and source is published in full.
| # | State / Territory | Composite | Co. regs | ABN regs | AI adoption | NBN rate | Online trading | Digital skills | Broadband | Policy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Australian Capital Territory Leader | 96 | 5/3 | |||||||
| 2 | New South Wales | 85 | 4/3 | |||||||
| 3 | Victoria | 81 | 4/3 | |||||||
| 4 | Queensland | 81 | 4/3 | |||||||
| 5 | South Australia | 79 | 4/3 | |||||||
| 6 | Western Australia | 77 | 4/3 | |||||||
| 7 | Tasmania | 72 | 3/3 | |||||||
| 8 | Northern Territory | 46 | 2/3 |
Net overseas migration data is presented as a contextual overlay, not a scored component. It explains the mechanism behind SA and WA's distinctive registration signals and has direct implications for which states will move up or down this ranking in coming quarters.
The forward implication: The fastest-climbing states and territories in future editions will be those with the most targeted skills migration pipelines. States that combine high-volume targeted migration with strong broadband infrastructure and an active AI adoption program are structurally positioned to close the gap on the leaders.
| Component | Weight | NSW | VIC | QLD | WA | SA | ACT | TAS | NT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company registrations | 20% | 36.03 | 32.55 | 34.48 | 28.97 | 26.47 | 29.82 | 13.27 | 18.5 |
| ABN registrations | 20% | 77.69 | 73.19 | 73.78 | 78.39 | 99.57 | 160.42 | 114.45 | 56.51 |
| AI adoption index | 15% | 77 | 75 | 73 | 71 | 72 | 88 | 70 | 45 |
| NBN premises coverage | 10% | 96 | 95 | 94 | 92 | 94 | 98 | 93 | 66 |
| Online trading | 10% | 60 | 57 | 55 | 53 | 52 | 65 | 50 | 45 |
| Broadband speed | 10% | 99.8 | 100.1 | 98.1 | 96.7 | 101.4 | 94 | 99.6 | — |
| Digital skills penetration | 10% | 70 | 69 | 67 | 65 | 66 | 80 | 64 | 40 |
| State/territory digital policy | 5% | 4.2 | 4 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 4.9 | 3.4 | 2.2 |
The policy score carries 5% of composite weight — the lowest component — because a state can publish an AI strategy without a single SME adopting AI. The score tracks enabling conditions, not results. The rubric is published in full and is open to challenge.
Rubric: Three binary criteria, +1 each. (1) Dedicated AI strategy: publicly released document specifically addressing AI adoption at state level. (2) Active digital economy fund: funded program actively accepting applications. (3) Funded startup program: state-government-funded accelerator or pre-seed fund with active cohorts.
| State | AI strategy | Digital economy fund | Startup program | Score | Key programs and notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSW | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 3 / 3 | |
| VIC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 3 / 3 | |
| QLD | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 3 / 3 | |
| WA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 3 / 3 | |
| SA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 3 / 3 | |
| ACT | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 3 / 3 | |
| TAS | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 3 / 3 | |
| NT | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | 2 / 3 |
Composite score
Each jurisdiction's composite Digital Fitness Score is a weighted average of eight component scores. Each component is indexed against the highest-performing state or territory for that period, which receives a score of 100. All other states are scored relative to this benchmark.
Component weights
Company and ABN formation rates are calculated per 10,000 ABS Estimated Resident Population. Broadband speed, NBN coverage, and online trading percentages are sourced directly from government and regulatory publications. Digital skills scores use LinkedIn's methodology for skills penetration. State policy scores are assessed quarterly against published AI and digital economy strategy documents.
The Honcho Australian State & Territory Digital Fitness Score is produced by Honcho Research, a division of Business Switch Pty Ltd (ABN 83 134 235 304). Data is sourced from public government and regulatory publications. Scores are indicative only and do not constitute financial or investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future rankings. All data is current as at the quarter end date. Australian English throughout.
Honcho helps Australians register, run and grow their businesses. From company and business name registration to registered office address, annual compliance, domain, email and virtual services, Honcho is the platform over 900,000 Australians have used to start and manage their businesses.
The Honcho Australian State & Territory Digital Fitness Score is published quarterly as a contribution to the public understanding of how Australia's SME base is building digital and AI capability.